Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Centralising acute stroke services in urban areas can reduce mortality and length of stay, and increase delivery of evidence-based care; type of service model, planning change and context affect implementation.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Naomi J Fulop, Angus I G Ramsay, Rachael M Hunter, Christopher McKevitt, Catherine Perry, Simon J Turner, Ruth Boaden, Iliatha Papachristou, Anthony G Rudd, Pippa J Tyrrell, Charles D A Wolfe & Stephen Morris.

Naomi J Fulop 1,*, Angus I G Ramsay 1, Rachael M Hunter 2, Christopher McKevitt 3, Catherine Perry 4, Simon J Turner 5, Ruth Boaden 4, Iliatha Papachristou 6, Anthony G Rudd 7, Pippa J Tyrrell 8, Charles D A Wolfe 3, Stephen Morris 1

1 Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
2 Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
3 Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences Research, King’s College London, London, UK
4 Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
5 Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6 Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
7 Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
8 Stroke and Vascular Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions