Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

Emergency departments are pressed to reduce avoidable acute admissions and breaches in the 4-hour target wait. In response four studied hospitals developed new models of care including a hospital-based Acute GP Service; a multidisciplinary ‘frailty’ team; pathways to community-based specialist reviews; ‘space’ outside the ED to observe, investigate, treat and review patients; and diverse deployment of senior emergency care consultants to ‘cherry pick’ patients needing expertise and to oversee and ‘control’ the whole system in partnership with other staff.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jonathan Pinkney,1,* Susanna Rance,1,2 Jonathan Benger,3 Heather Brant,4 Sian Joel-Edgar,5 Dawn Swancutt,1 Debra Westlake,1 Mark Pearson,6 Daniel Thomas,1 Ingrid Holme,7 Ruth Endacott,8 Rob Anderson,6 Michael Allen,6 Sarah Purdy,4 John Campbell,6 Rod Sheaff,9 Richard Byng,1 

1 Centre for Clinical Trials and Population Studies, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
2 Institute for Health and Human Development, University of East London, London, UK
3 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
4 School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
5 University of Exeter Business School, Exeter, UK
6 University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
7 Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ulster, Londonderry, UK
8 Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
9 School of Government, Faculty of Business, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
* Corresponding author ; Email: jonathan.pinkney@plymouth.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue:{{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://dx.doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:
{{classification.Category.Concept}}

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

An error has occurred in processing the XML document

 

Responses to this report

 

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below.

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions