Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

This study found that health improvement studies in general practice and primary care tend to focus on interventions themselves rather than the organisational context, and that general practitioners concentrate on individual patients. There is little evidence on the best approaches to delivering preventative care and health improvement.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Stephen Peckham,1,2,* Jane Falconer,2 Steve Gillam,3 Alison Hann,4 Sally Kendall,5 Kiran Nanchahal,6 Benjamin Ritchie,2 Rebecca Rogers,2 Andrew Wallace,2,7 

1 Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Kent, UK
2 Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
3 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
4 Public Health and Policy Studies, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
5 Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
6 Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
7 Department of Social Policy, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
* Corresponding author ; Email: S.Peckham@kent.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue:{{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://dx.doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

You might also be interested in:
{{classification.Category.Concept}}

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

An error has occurred in processing the XML document

 

Responses to this report

 

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below.

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions