Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study found variation in practices for communicating screening results, produced co-designed interventions that showed promise in improving communication, and recommended further feasibility testing prior to a national evaluation study.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Jane Chudleigh 1,*, Pru Holder 2, Francesco Fusco 3, James R Bonham 4, Mandy Bryon 5, Louise Moody 6, Stephen Morris 3, Ellinor K Olander 2, Alan Simpson 7, Holly Chinnery 8, Fiona Ulph 9, Kevin W Southern 10

1 Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, London, UK
2 Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London, UK
3 School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
4 Division of Pharmacy, Diagnostics and Genetics, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
5 Paediatric Psychology and Play Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
6 School of Art and Design, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
7 Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
8 Faculty of Sports, Health and Applied Science, St Mary’s University Twickenham, London, UK
9 Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
10 Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
* Corresponding author Email: jane.2.chudleigh@kcl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions