Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study found accessing medicines required considerable co-ordination work and key issues were relationships and team integration, diversifying the prescriber workforce, access to shared records, and improved community pharmacy stock.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Sue Latter 1,*, Natasha Campling 1, Jacqueline Birtwistle 2, Alison Richardson 1,3, Michael I Bennett 2, David Meads 4, Alison Blenkinsopp 5, Liz Breen 5, Zoe Edwards 2, Claire Sloan 4, Elizabeth Miller 6,7, Sean Ewings 8, Miriam Santer 9, Lesley Roberts 10

1 School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
2 Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
4 Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
5 School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
6 Pharmacy, St Luke’s Hospice, Sheffield, UK
7 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
8 Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
9 School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
10 Patient and public involvement representative, Staffordshire, UK
* Corresponding author Email: S.M.Latter@soton.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Alison Richardson reports secondment to NHS England (London, UK) as Head of Nursing Research (Academic Leadership & Strategy) and grants from the National Institute for Health and Care Research outside the submitted work.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document