Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

There was no evidence that reducing the current 3-hour time-to-bedside target for transport teams will improve patient outcomes, although timeliness was an important consideration for parents and staff.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Padmanabhan Ramnarayan 1,*,, Sarah Seaton 2, Ruth Evans 1, Victoria Barber 1, Emma Hudson 3, Enoch Kung 4, Matthew Entwistle 5, Anna Pearce 5, Patrick Davies 6, Will Marriage 7, Paul Mouncey 8, Eithne Polke 1, Fatemah Rajah 9, Nicholas Hudson 8, Robert Darnell 8, Elizabeth Draper 2, Jo Wray 1, Stephen Morris 3, Christina Pagel 4

1 Children’s Acute Transport Service (CATS), Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
3 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
4 Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
5 Patient representative, , UK
6 Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
7 University Hospitals of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
8 Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK
9 Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions