Mortality impact, risks, and benefits of general population screening for ovarian cancer: the UKCTOCS randomised controlled trial

Usha Menon ^1,^*, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj ¹, Matthew Burnell ¹, Andy Ryan ¹, Jatinderpal K Kalsi ^2,³, Naveena Singh ⁴, Anne Dawnay ⁵, Lesley Fallowfield ⁶, Alistair J McGuire ⁷, Stuart Campbell ⁸, Steven J Skates ⁹, Mahesh Parmar ¹, Ian J Jacobs ¹⁰

¹ MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
² Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
³ CRUK UCL Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
⁴ Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
⁵ Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Barts Health NHS Service Trust, London, UK
⁶ Sussex Health Outcomes Research and Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
⁷ London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
⁸ Create Health, London, UK
⁹ Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
¹⁰ Department of Women’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
^* Corresponding author Email: u.menon@ucl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}}, Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}}

Citation: {{metadata.Citation}}

[Image - Crossmark status check]

This article has been published as part of the NIHR Journals Library new threaded publication model

Find out more about threaded publication

Article Content

Article Content
Abstract
Article Source
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary
More from this thread

The full text of this article is available as a PDF document from ...

Responses to this report

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is ten minus two?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

Journals Library

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Toolkit

Article Content

Responses to this report