Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research
Advanced


Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.


Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

View Award


High-sensitivity troponin assays may be more cost-effective than standard troponin testing, and strategies involving multiple tests are likely to be more effective than a single test.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}


Marie Westwood
[Image - ORCID logo], Bram Ramaekers
[Image - ORCID logo], Sabine Grimm
[Image - ORCID logo], Gill Worthy
[Image - ORCID logo], Debra Fayter
[Image - ORCID logo], Nigel Armstrong
[Image - ORCID logo], Titas Buksnys
[Image - ORCID logo], Janine Ross
[Image - ORCID logo], Manuela Joore
[Image - ORCID logo] & Jos Kleijnen
[Image - ORCID logo].


Marie Westwood 1,*, Bram Ramaekers 2, Sabine Grimm 2, Gill Worthy 1, Debra Fayter 1, Nigel Armstrong 1, Titas Buksnys 1, Janine Ross 1, Manuela Joore 2, Jos Kleijnen 1,3

1 Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
3 School for Public Health and Primary Care, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
* Corresponding author Email: marie@systematic-reviews.com


Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content


The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.


The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.




If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.








Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.












By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions




An error has occurred in processing the XML document


© NIHR 2024