An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not FoundPlease choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
The 'Contraception Choices' website was popular with young women but was not associated with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception or satisfaction with contraceptive method at 6 months.
{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}
Judith Stephenson
[Image - ORCID logo], Julia V Bailey
[Image - ORCID logo], Ann Blandford
[Image - ORCID logo], Nataliya Brima
[Image - ORCID logo], Andrew Copas
[Image - ORCID logo], Preethy D’Souza
[Image - ORCID logo], Anasztazia Gubijev
[Image - ORCID logo], Rachael Hunter
[Image - ORCID logo], Jill Shawe
[Image - ORCID logo], Greta Rait
[Image - ORCID logo] & Sandy Oliver
[Image - ORCID logo].
Judith Stephenson 1,*, Julia V Bailey 2, Ann Blandford 3, Nataliya Brima 4, Andrew Copas 4, Preethy D’Souza 5, Anasztazia Gubijev 1, Rachael Hunter 6, Jill Shawe 7, Greta Rait 8, Sandy Oliver 5,9
1 UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
2 Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
3 UCL Interaction Centre (UCLIC), University College London, London, UK
4 Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
5 Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK
6 Health Economics, University College London, London, UK
7 Institute of Health and Community, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
8 PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
9 Africa Centre for Evidence, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
* Corresponding author Email: Judith.stephenson@ucl.ac.uk
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
[Image - Crossmark status check]The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document
© NIHR 2024