Robot-assisted training compared with an enhanced upper limb therapy programme and with usual care for upper limb functional limitation after stroke: the RATULS three-group RCT

Rodgers, Helen; Bosomworth, Helen; Krebs, Hermano I; van Wijck, Frederike; Howel, Denise; Wilson, Nina; Finch, Tracy; Alvarado, Natasha; Ternent, Laura; Fernandez-Garcia, Cristina; Aird, Lydia; Andole, Sreeman; Cohen, David L; Dawson, Jesse; Ford, Gary A; Francis, Richard; Hogg, Steven; Hughes, Niall; Price, Christopher I; Turner, Duncan L; Vale, Luke; Wilkes, Scott; Shaw, Lisa

doi:10.3310/hta24540

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

Robot-assisted training did not improve upper limb function after stroke when compared with an enhanced upper limb therapy programme, or usual care.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Helen Rodgers ^1,^2,^3,^*,^†, Helen Bosomworth ^1,^*,^†, Hermano I Krebs ⁴, Frederike van Wijck ⁵, Denise Howel ⁶, Nina Wilson ⁶, Tracy Finch ⁷, Natasha Alvarado ⁸, Laura Ternent ⁶, Cristina Fernandez-Garcia ⁶, Lydia Aird ², Sreeman Andole ⁹, David L Cohen ¹⁰, Jesse Dawson ¹¹, Gary A Ford ^1,^12,¹³, Richard Francis ¹, Steven Hogg ¹⁴, Niall Hughes ¹⁵, Christopher I Price ^1,², Duncan L Turner ¹⁶, Luke Vale ⁶, Scott Wilkes ¹⁷, Lisa Shaw ¹

¹ Stroke Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
² Stroke Northumbria, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside, UK
³ Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁴ Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
⁵ School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
⁶ Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁷ Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁸ School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
⁹ Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK
¹⁰ London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
¹¹ Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
¹² Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
¹³ Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
¹⁴ Lay investigator (contact Stroke Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
¹⁵ NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
¹⁶ School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, London, UK
¹⁷ School of Medicine, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
^* Corresponding author Emails: helen.rodgers@newcastle.ac.uk and helen.bosomworth@newcastle.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is thirty divided by five?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document