Two speeds of increasing milk feeds for very preterm or very low-birthweight infants: the SIFT RCT

Dorling, Jon; Hewer, Oliver; Hurd, Madeleine; Bari, Vasha; Bosiak, Beth; Bowler, Ursula; King, Andrew; Linsell, Louise; Murray, David; Omar, Omar; Partlett, Christopher; Rounding, Catherine; Townend, John; Abbott, Jane; Berrington, Janet; Boyle, Elaine; Embleton, Nicholas; Johnson, Samantha; Leaf, Alison; McCormick, Kenny; McGuire, William; Patel, Mehali; Roberts, Tracy; Stenson, Ben; Tahir, Warda; Monahan, Mark; Richards, Judy; Rankin, Judith; Juszczak, Edmund

doi:10.3310/hta24180

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This trial of over 2800 infants found that faster daily feed increments of 30 ml/kg or 18 ml/kg did not increase survival without moderate or severe neurodevelopmental disability at 24 months.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Jon Dorling ^1,^*, Oliver Hewer ², Madeleine Hurd ², Vasha Bari ², Beth Bosiak ³, Ursula Bowler ², Andrew King ², Louise Linsell ², David Murray ², Omar Omar ⁴, Christopher Partlett ⁵, Catherine Rounding ², John Townend ², Jane Abbott ⁶, Janet Berrington ⁷, Elaine Boyle ⁸, Nicholas Embleton ⁷, Samantha Johnson ⁸, Alison Leaf ⁹, Kenny McCormick ¹⁰, William McGuire ¹¹, Mehali Patel ⁶, Tracy Roberts ¹², Ben Stenson ¹³, Warda Tahir ¹², Mark Monahan ¹², Judy Richards ¹⁴, Judith Rankin ¹⁴, Edmund Juszczak ²

¹ Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
² National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
³ Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
⁴ Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
⁵ Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
⁶ Bliss, London, UK
⁷ Newcastle Neonatal Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁸ Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
⁹ National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre Department of Child Health, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
¹⁰ John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
¹¹ Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
¹² School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
¹³ The Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
¹⁴ Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: jon.dorling@iwk.nshealth.ca

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is three plus zero?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document