An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not FoundPlease choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
The summary sensitivity of lead-I ECG devices was 93.9% and the summary specificity was 96.5%, with costs per QALY for all lead-I ECG devices being between £1000 and £16,000.
{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}
Rui Duarte
[Image - ORCID logo], Angela Stainthorpe
[Image - ORCID logo], Janette Greenhalgh
[Image - ORCID logo], Marty Richardson
[Image - ORCID logo], Sarah Nevitt
[Image - ORCID logo], James Mahon
[Image - ORCID logo], Eleanor Kotas
[Image - ORCID logo], Angela Boland
[Image - ORCID logo], Howard Thom
[Image - ORCID logo], Tom Marshall
[Image - ORCID logo], Mark Hall
[Image - ORCID logo] & Yemisi Takwoingi
[Image - ORCID logo].
Rui Duarte 1,*, Angela Stainthorpe 1, Janette Greenhalgh 1, Marty Richardson 1, Sarah Nevitt 1,2, James Mahon 3, Eleanor Kotas 1, Angela Boland 1, Howard Thom 4, Tom Marshall 5, Mark Hall 6, Yemisi Takwoingi 5,7
1 Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group (LRiG), Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
2 Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3 Coldingham Analytical Services, Berwickshire, UK
4 Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
5 Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
6 Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
7 NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
* Corresponding author Email: rui.duarte@liverpool.ac.uk
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
[Image - Crossmark status check]The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document
© NIHR 2024