A bespoke smoking cessation service compared with treatment as usual for people with severe mental ill health: the SCIMITAR+ RCT

Peckham, Emily; Arundel, Catherine; Bailey, Della; Crosland, Suzanne; Fairhurst, Caroline; Heron, Paul; Hewitt, Catherine; Li, Jinshuo; Parrott, Steve; Bradshaw, Tim; Horspool, Michelle; Hughes, Elizabeth; Hughes, Tom; Ker, Suzy; Leahy, Moira; McCloud, Tayla; Osborn, David; Reilly, Joseph; Steare, Thomas; Ballantyne, Emma; Bidwell, Polly; Bonner, Susan; Brennan, Diane; Callen, Tracy; Carey, Alex; Colbeck, Charlotte; Coton, Debbie; Donaldson, Emma; Evans, Kimberley; Herlihy, Hannah; Khan, Wajid; Nyathi, Lizwi; Nyamadzawo, Elizabeth; Oldknow, Helen; Phiri, Peter; Rathod, Shanaya; Rea, Jamie; Romain-Hooper, Crystal-Bella; Smith, Kaye; Stribling, Alison; Vickers, Carinna; Gilbody, Simon

doi:10.3310/hta23500

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This trial demonstrated that the SCIMITAR+ intervention was not able to detect an effect at the 12-month primary end point, but it did increase smoking cessation at 6 months.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Emily Peckham ^1,^*, Catherine Arundel ¹, Della Bailey ¹, Suzanne Crosland ¹, Caroline Fairhurst ¹, Paul Heron ¹, Catherine Hewitt ¹, Jinshuo Li ¹, Steve Parrott ¹, Tim Bradshaw ², Michelle Horspool ³, Elizabeth Hughes ⁴, Tom Hughes ⁵, Suzy Ker ⁶, Moira Leahy ³, Tayla McCloud ⁷, David Osborn ⁷, Joseph Reilly ⁶, Thomas Steare ⁷, Emma Ballantyne ⁸, Polly Bidwell ⁹, Susan Bonner ¹⁰, Diane Brennan ¹¹, Tracy Callen ¹², Alex Carey ³, Charlotte Colbeck ³, Debbie Coton ¹³, Emma Donaldson ¹⁴, Kimberley Evans ¹⁵, Hannah Herlihy ¹⁶, Wajid Khan ¹⁷, Lizwi Nyathi ¹¹, Elizabeth Nyamadzawo ¹⁵, Helen Oldknow ⁸, Peter Phiri ¹⁸, Shanaya Rathod ¹⁸, Jamie Rea ¹⁹, Crystal-Bella Romain-Hooper ⁵, Kaye Smith ¹², Alison Stribling ²⁰, Carinna Vickers ²¹, Simon Gilbody ¹

¹ Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
² Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
³ Research and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
⁴ School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
⁵ Research and Development, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
⁶ North East York Community Mental Health Team, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
⁷ Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
⁸ Research and Development, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
⁹ Research and Development, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
¹⁰ Research and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton on Tees, UK
¹¹ Research and Development, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Sleaford, UK
¹² Research and Development, Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
¹³ Research and Development, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
¹⁴ Research and Development, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
¹⁵ Research and Development, Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
¹⁶ Research and Development, Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, UK
¹⁷ Research and Development, South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK
¹⁸ Research and Development, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
¹⁹ Research and Development, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
²⁰ Research and Development, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
²¹ Research and Development, Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, South Petherton, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: emily.peckham@york.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is five plus one?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document