Computerised interpretation of the fetal heart rate during labour: a randomised controlled trial (INFANT)

Brocklehurst, Peter; Field, David; Greene, Keith; Juszczak, Edmund; Kenyon, Sara; Linsell, Louise; Mabey, Chris; Newburn, Mary; Plachcinski, Rachel; Quigley, Maria; Steer, Philip; Schroeder, Liz; Rivero-Arias, Oliver

doi:10.3310/hta22090

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate in labour did not improve outcomes in the neonatal period or at 2 years.

Peter Brocklehurst
[Image - ORCID logo], David Field
[Image - ORCID logo], Keith Greene
[Image - ORCID logo], Edmund Juszczak
[Image - ORCID logo], Sara Kenyon
[Image - ORCID logo], Louise Linsell
[Image - ORCID logo], Chris Mabey
[Image - ORCID logo], Mary Newburn
[Image - ORCID logo], Rachel Plachcinski
[Image - ORCID logo], Maria Quigley
[Image - ORCID logo], Philip Steer
[Image - ORCID logo], Liz Schroeder
[Image - ORCID logo] & Oliver Rivero-Arias
[Image - ORCID logo].

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Peter Brocklehurst ^1,^*, David Field ², Keith Greene ³, Edmund Juszczak ⁴, Sara Kenyon ⁵, Louise Linsell ⁴, Chris Mabey ⁶, Mary Newburn ⁷, Rachel Plachcinski ⁸, Maria Quigley ⁴, Philip Steer ⁹, Liz Schroeder ¹⁰, Oliver Rivero-Arias ⁴

¹ Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
² Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
³ University College London, London, UK
⁴ National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit (NPEU CTU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
⁵ Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
⁶ K2 Medical Systems, Plymouth, UK
⁷ Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South London, King’s College London, London, UK
⁸ National Childbirth Trust, London, UK
⁹ Imperial College London, London, UK
¹⁰ Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
^* Corresponding author Email: p.brocklehurst@Bham.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is one plus zero?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document