An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not FoundPlease choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
Study found that the majority of RCTs of selected interventions for breast cancer had not reported the same outcome in both an abstract and a full publication, and that there was insufficient evidence to identify biases in terms of whether positive results were more likely to be fully published than non-significant ones
{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}
A Takeda, E Loveman, P Harris, D Hartwell & K Welch.
A Takeda ,*, E Loveman , P Harris , D Hartwell , K Welch
Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre (SHTAC), University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
* Corresponding author Email:
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
[Image - Crossmark status check]The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document
© NIHR 2024