Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: PHOTO RCT

Heer, Rakesh; Lewis, Rebecca; Duncan, Anne; Penegar, Steven; Vadiveloo, Thenmalar; Clark, Emma; Yu, Ge; Mariappan, Paramananthan; Cresswell, Joanne; McGrath, John; N’Dow, James; Nabi, Ghulam; Mostafid, Hugh; Kelly, John; Ramsay, Craig; Lazarowicz, Henry; Allan, Angela; Breckons, Matthew; Campbell, Karen; Campbell, Louise; Feber, Andy; McDonald, Alison; Norrie, John; Orozco-Leal, Giovany; Rice, Stephen; Tandogdu, Zafer; Taylor, Ernest; Wilson, Laura; Vale, Luke; MacLennan, Graeme; Hall, Emma

doi:10.3310/PLPU1526

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This trial found that photodynamic diagnosis did not lead to a reduction in recurrence after 3 years' follow-up.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Rakesh Heer ^1,^*, Rebecca Lewis ², Anne Duncan ³, Steven Penegar ², Thenmalar Vadiveloo ³, Emma Clark ¹, Ge Yu ¹, Paramananthan Mariappan ⁴, Joanne Cresswell ⁵, John McGrath ⁶, James N’Dow ⁷, Ghulam Nabi ⁸, Hugh Mostafid ⁹, John Kelly ¹⁰, Craig Ramsay ¹¹, Henry Lazarowicz ¹², Angela Allan ¹³, Matthew Breckons ¹, Karen Campbell ³, Louise Campbell ³, Andy Feber ¹⁰, Alison McDonald ³, John Norrie ¹⁴, Giovany Orozco-Leal ¹, Stephen Rice ¹, Zafer Tandogdu ¹⁰, Ernest Taylor ¹⁵, Laura Wilson ¹, Luke Vale ¹, Graeme MacLennan ³, Emma Hall ²

¹ Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
² Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
³ Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
⁴ Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
⁵ Department of Urology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
⁶ Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
⁷ Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
⁸ School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
⁹ Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
¹⁰ University College London Cancer Institute, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
¹¹ Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
¹² Department of Urology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
¹³ Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
¹⁴ Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
¹⁵ , Tyne and Wear, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: rakesh.heer@newcastle.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is six multiplied by three?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document