Routinely used interventions to improve attachment in infants and young children: a national survey and two systematic reviews

Wright, Barry; Fearon, Pasco; Garside, Megan; Tsappis, Eleni; Amoah, Elaine; Glaser, Danya; Allgar, Victoria; Minnis, Helen; Woolgar, Matthew; Churchill, Rachel; McMillan, Dean; Fonagy, Peter; O’Sullivan, Alison; McHale, Michelle

doi:10.3310/IVCN8847

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This study found the most commonly used attachment interventions in UK services currently have a limited evidence base and those with stronger evidence bases are less widely used.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Barry Wright ¹, Pasco Fearon ², Megan Garside ³, Eleni Tsappis ³, Elaine Amoah ², Danya Glaser ², Victoria Allgar ⁴, Helen Minnis ⁵, Matthew Woolgar ⁶, Rachel Churchill ⁷, Dean McMillan ⁸, Peter Fonagy ², Alison O’Sullivan ⁹, Michelle McHale ¹⁰

¹ Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
² Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
³ Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK
⁴ Peninsula Medical School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
⁵ Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
⁶ King’s College London, London, UK
⁷ Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
⁸ Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
⁹ National Children’s Bureau, London, UK
¹⁰ Attachment Parenting UK, Totnes, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: barry.wright1@nhs.net

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is six multiplied by three?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document