GPs' involvement to improve care quality in care homes in the UK: a realist review

Chadborn, Neil H; Devi, Reena; Williams, Christopher; Sartain, Kathleen; Goodman, Claire; Gordon, Adam L

doi:10.3310/hsdr09200

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health and Care Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This review found that GPs make valuable contributions to quality improvement, often in supporting other professionals who take the lead, and where working relationships are negotiated and resourced.

Neil H Chadborn
[Image - ORCID logo], Reena Devi
[Image - ORCID logo], Christopher Williams
[Image - ORCID logo], Kathleen Sartain
[Image - ORCID logo], Claire Goodman
[Image - ORCID logo] & Adam L Gordon
[Image - ORCID logo].

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Neil H Chadborn ^1,^2,^*, Reena Devi ³, Christopher Williams ⁴, Kathleen Sartain ⁵, Claire Goodman ^6,⁷, Adam L Gordon ^1,²

¹ Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
² NIHR Applied Research Collaboration – East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK
³ School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
⁴ Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
⁵ Dementia and Frail Older Persons Patient and Public Involvement Group, Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
⁶ Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
⁷ NIHR Applied Research Collaboration – East of England (ARC-EoE), Cambridge, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: neil.chadborn@nottingham.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is thirty divided by five?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions