A framework and toolkit of interventions to enhance reflective learning among health-care professionals: the PEARL mixed-methods study

Bion, Julian; Brookes, Olivia; Brown, Celia; Tarrant, Carolyn; Archer, Julian; Buckley, Duncan; Buckley, Lisa-Marie; Clement, Ian; Evison, Felicity; Smith, Fang Gao; Gibbins, Chris; Hayton, Emma-Jo; Jones, Jennifer; Lilford, Richard; Mullhi, Randeep; Packer, Greg; Perkins, Gavin D; Shelton, Jonathan; Snelson, Catherine; Sullivan, Paul; Vlaev, Ivo; Wolstenholme, Daniel; Wright, Stephen; ,

doi:10.3310/hsdr08320

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health and Care Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This study used patient and staff experience to co-design a reflective learning framework and toolkit of interventions, to help health-care staff obtain meaningful feedback and stimulate effective reflective learning.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Julian Bion ^1,^*, Olivia Brookes ², Celia Brown ³, Carolyn Tarrant ⁴, Julian Archer ⁵, Duncan Buckley ⁶, Lisa-Marie Buckley ⁶, Ian Clement ⁷, Felicity Evison ⁸, Fang Gao Smith ⁹, Chris Gibbins ¹⁰, Emma-Jo Hayton ¹¹, Jennifer Jones ⁴, Richard Lilford ¹², Randeep Mullhi ¹³, Greg Packer ¹³, Gavin D Perkins ¹⁴, Jonathan Shelton ⁷, Catherine Snelson ^11,¹³, Paul Sullivan ¹⁵, Ivo Vlaev ¹⁶, Daniel Wolstenholme ¹⁷, Stephen Wright ⁷, ^†

¹ Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
² University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
³ Population Evidence and Technologies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
⁴ Social Science Applied to Healthcare Improvement Research (SAPPHIRE) Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
⁵ Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
⁶ Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Birmingham, UK
⁷ Critical Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁸ Informatics Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
⁹ Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
¹⁰ Acute Medicine, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
¹¹ Acute Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
¹² Warwick Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
¹³ Critical Care, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
¹⁴ Critical Care Medicine, Warwick Medical School, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
¹⁵ Acute Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
¹⁶ Behavioural Science Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
¹⁷ National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber, Sheffield, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: j.f.bion@bham.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is nine minus one?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions