Components of interventions to reduce restrictive practices with children and young people in institutional settings: the Contrast systematic mapping review

Baker, John; Berzins, Kathryn; Canvin, Krysia; Kendal, Sarah; Branthonne-Foster, Stella; Wright, Judy; McDougall, Tim; Goldson, Barry; Kellar, Ian; Duxbury, Joy

doi:10.3310/YVKT5692

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health and Care Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This study generated the first review of evidence on the content and effectiveness of the interventions, which tended to be complex with inconsistent reporting and limited robust evaluation data.

John Baker
[Image - ORCID logo], Kathryn Berzins
[Image - ORCID logo], Krysia Canvin
[Image - ORCID logo], Sarah Kendal
[Image - ORCID logo], Stella Branthonne-Foster
[Image - ORCID logo], Judy Wright
[Image - ORCID logo], Tim McDougall
[Image - ORCID logo], Barry Goldson
[Image - ORCID logo], Ian Kellar
[Image - ORCID logo] & Joy Duxbury
[Image - ORCID logo].

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

John Baker ^1,^*, Kathryn Berzins ¹, Krysia Canvin ¹, Sarah Kendal ¹, Stella Branthonne-Foster ², Judy Wright ³, Tim McDougall ⁴, Barry Goldson ⁵, Ian Kellar ⁶, Joy Duxbury ⁷

¹ School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
² Patient and public involvement representative, London, UK
³ Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
⁴ Specialist Services, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
⁵ Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
⁶ School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
⁷ Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: J.Baker@leeds.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is seven multiplied by four?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions