Multiple versus single risk behaviour interventions for people with severe mental illness: a network meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis

Meader, Nick; Melton, Hollie; Evans, Connor; Wright, Kath; Shiers, David; Ratschen, Elena; Dias, Sofia; Dare, Ceri; Johnston, Gordon; Kaur, Harminder; Syrett, Michel; Armitage, Christopher J; Churchill, Rachel; Gilbody, Simon; Coventry, Peter

doi:10.3310/NFIZ5916

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health and Care Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This study found both multiple and single risk behaviour interventions for people with severe mental illness were associated with positive but modest benefits on most outcomes.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Nick Meader ^1,^*, Hollie Melton ¹, Connor Evans ¹, Kath Wright ¹, David Shiers ^2,³, Elena Ratschen ⁴, Sofia Dias ¹, Ceri Dare ⁵, Gordon Johnston ^5,⁶, Harminder Kaur ⁵, Michel Syrett ^5,⁶, Christopher J Armitage ^7,⁸, Rachel Churchill ¹, Simon Gilbody ⁴, Peter Coventry ^1,⁴

¹ Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
² Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
³ Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
⁴ Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
⁵ HEALTH study patient and public involvement group, , UK
⁶ Lived Experience Research Collective, HEALTH study patient and public involvement group, , UK
⁷ Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
⁸ Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: nick.meader@york.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is six multiplied by three?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions