Intensive support teams for adults with intellectual disabilities displaying challenging behaviour: the IST-ID mixed-methods study

Hassiotis, Angela; Kouroupa, Athanasia; Hamza, Leila; Morant, Nicola; Hall, Ian; Marston, Louise; Romeo, Renee; Yaziji, Nahel; Jones, Rebecca; Courtenay, Ken; Langdon, Peter; Taggart, Laurence; Crossey, Vicky; Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor

doi:10.3310/CHDC1642

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health and Care Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This study identified that there were two distinct models of intensive support teams, enhanced and independent; however, neither demonstrated advantages or disadvantages in terms of clinical or cost outcomes.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Angela Hassiotis ^1,^*, Athanasia Kouroupa ¹, Leila Hamza ¹, Nicola Morant ¹, Ian Hall ², Louise Marston ³, Renee Romeo ⁴, Nahel Yaziji ⁴, Rebecca Jones ¹, Ken Courtenay ⁵, Peter Langdon ⁶, Laurence Taggart ⁷, Vicky Crossey ⁸, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans ¹

¹ Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
² Hackney Integrated Learning Disability Service, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
³ Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
⁴ Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
⁵ Assessment and Intervention Team, Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
⁶ Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
⁷ Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Antrim, UK
⁸ South West Community Learning Disability Team & Mental Health Intensive Support and Treatment Team, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: a.hassiotis@ucl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is nine minus one?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions