Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health and Care Research
Advanced


Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.


Home >> Journals >> Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

View Award


Using central aortic systolic pressure was not found to be a superior means to stratify men under 55 with grade 1 hypertension for antihypertensive therapy, when compared with conventional blood pressure measurement.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}


Bryan Williams
[Image - ORCID logo], Ewan McFarlane
[Image - ORCID logo], Dawid Jedrzejewski
[Image - ORCID logo] & Peter S Lacy
[Image - ORCID logo].


Bryan Williams 1,2,*, Ewan McFarlane 1, Dawid Jedrzejewski 1, Peter S Lacy 1,2

1 University College London Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
2 National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: bryan.williams@ucl.ac.uk


Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.


The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.




If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.








 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.












By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions




© NIHR 2024