An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.
Home >> Journals >> Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation >> Page Not FoundPlease choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
Using central aortic systolic pressure was not found to be a superior means to stratify men under 55 with grade 1 hypertension for antihypertensive therapy, when compared with conventional blood pressure measurement.
{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}
Bryan Williams
[Image - ORCID logo], Ewan McFarlane
[Image - ORCID logo], Dawid Jedrzejewski
[Image - ORCID logo] & Peter S Lacy
[Image - ORCID logo].
Bryan Williams 1,2,*, Ewan McFarlane 1, Dawid Jedrzejewski 1, Peter S Lacy 1,2
1 University College London Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
2 National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: bryan.williams@ucl.ac.uk
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
[Image - Crossmark status check]The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
No responses have been published.
© NIHR 2024