An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not FoundPlease choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
This study found less invasive methods of autopsy are likely to be acceptable for bereaved parents and may increase uptake but further studies are required.
{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}
Celine Lewis
[Image - ORCID logo], John C Hutchinson
[Image - ORCID logo], Megan Riddington
[Image - ORCID logo], Melissa Hill
[Image - ORCID logo], Owen J Arthurs
[Image - ORCID logo], Jane Fisher
[Image - ORCID logo], Angie Wade
[Image - ORCID logo], Caroline J Doré
[Image - ORCID logo], Lyn S Chitty
[Image - ORCID logo] & Neil J Sebire
[Image - ORCID logo].
Celine Lewis 1,2, John C Hutchinson 3, Megan Riddington 4, Melissa Hill 1,2, Owen J Arthurs 5, Jane Fisher 6, Angie Wade 7, Caroline J Doré 8, Lyn S Chitty 1,2, Neil J Sebire 3,*
1 North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
3 Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Child Health/University College London, London, UK
4 Department of Psychological Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
5 Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
6 Antenatal Results and Choices, London, UK
7 Institute of Child Health; Population, Policy and Practice, University College London, London, UK
8 Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: neil.sebire@gosh.nhs.uk
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
[Image - Crossmark status check]The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document
© NIHR 2024