The Arabin pessary to prevent preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix: the STOPPIT 2 RCT

Norman, Jane E; Norrie, John; MacLennan, Graeme; Cooper, David; Whyte, Sonia; Chowdhry, Sushila; Cunningham-Burley, Sarah; Neilson, Aileen R; Mei, Xue W; Smith, Joel BE; Shennan, Andrew; Robson, Stephen C; Thornton, Steven; Kilby, Mark D; Marlow, Neil; Stock, Sarah J; Bennett, Philip R; Denton, Jane

doi:10.3310/hta25440

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

The Arabin cervical pessary plus standard care did not reduce either the rate of preterm birth or adverse neonatal outcomes, compared with standard care alone.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Jane E Norman ^1,^*, John Norrie ², Graeme MacLennan ³, David Cooper ³, Sonia Whyte ⁴, Sushila Chowdhry ⁵, Sarah Cunningham-Burley ⁵, Aileen R Neilson ⁵, Xue W Mei ⁶, Joel BE Smith ⁶, Andrew Shennan ⁷, Stephen C Robson ⁸, Steven Thornton ⁹, Mark D Kilby ¹⁰, Neil Marlow ¹¹, Sarah J Stock ⁵, Philip R Bennett ¹², Jane Denton ¹³

¹ Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
² Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
³ Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
⁴ Tommy’s Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
⁵ Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
⁶ Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
⁷ Tommy’s London Research Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
⁸ Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁹ Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
¹⁰ Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust and College of Medical and Dental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
¹¹ Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
¹² Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
¹³ The Multiple Births Foundation, London, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: jane.e.norman@bristol.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is nine minus one?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document