Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis

Bray, Nathan; Kolehmainen, Niina; McAnuff, Jennifer; Tanner, Louise; Tuersley, Lorna; Beyer, Fiona; Grayston, Aimee; Wilson, Dor; Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor; Noyes, Jane; Craig, Dawn

doi:10.3310/hta24500

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health Technology Assessment >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This study found that powered mobility interventions are likely to have multiple benefits for children under 5 years, despite the lack of robust evidence to demonstrate this.

Nathan Bray
[Image - ORCID logo], Niina Kolehmainen
[Image - ORCID logo], Jennifer McAnuff
[Image - ORCID logo], Louise Tanner
[Image - ORCID logo], Lorna Tuersley
[Image - ORCID logo], Fiona Beyer
[Image - ORCID logo], Aimee Grayston
[Image - ORCID logo], Dor Wilson
[Image - ORCID logo], Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
[Image - ORCID logo], Jane Noyes
[Image - ORCID logo] & Dawn Craig
[Image - ORCID logo].

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Nathan Bray ^1,^2,^*, Niina Kolehmainen ^3,⁴, Jennifer McAnuff ³, Louise Tanner ³, Lorna Tuersley ², Fiona Beyer ³, Aimee Grayston ⁵, Dor Wilson ³, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards ^1,², Jane Noyes ¹, Dawn Craig ³

¹ School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
² Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
³ Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁴ Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
⁵ Children’s Services, Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: n.bray@bangor.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is ten minus one?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document