Interventions to optimise the outputs of national clinical audits to improve the quality of health care: a multi-method study including RCT

Willis, Thomas A; Wright-Hughes, Alexandra; Weller, Ana; Alderson, Sarah L; Wilson, Stephanie; Walwyn, Rebecca; Wood, Su; Lorencatto, Fabiana; Farrin, Amanda; Hartley, Suzanne; Francis, Jillian; Seymour, Valentine; Brehaut, Jamie; Colquhoun, Heather; Grimshaw, Jeremy; Ivers, Noah; Feltbower, Richard; Keen, Justin; Brown, Benjamin C; Presseau, Justin; Gale, Chris P; Stanworth, Simon J; Foy, Robbie

doi:10.3310/QBBZ1124

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health and Care Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Health and Social Care Delivery Research >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This study found that national audit impacts may be enhanced by strengthening all aspects of feedback cycles, particularly effective feedback, and considering how different ways of reinforcing feedback act together.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Thomas A Willis ¹, Alexandra Wright-Hughes ², Ana Weller ³, Sarah L Alderson ¹, Stephanie Wilson ³, Rebecca Walwyn ², Su Wood ¹, Fabiana Lorencatto ⁴, Amanda Farrin ², Suzanne Hartley ², Jillian Francis ⁵, Valentine Seymour ⁵, Jamie Brehaut ⁶, Heather Colquhoun ⁷, Jeremy Grimshaw ⁶, Noah Ivers ⁸, Richard Feltbower ⁹, Justin Keen ¹, Benjamin C Brown ^10,¹¹, Justin Presseau ^6,¹², Chris P Gale ^9,^13,¹⁴, Simon J Stanworth ^15,^16,^17,¹⁸, Robbie Foy ^1,^*

¹ Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
² Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
³ Centre for Human-Computer Interaction Design, City, University of London, London, UK
⁴ Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
⁵ School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
⁶ Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
⁷ Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
⁸ Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
⁹ Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
¹⁰ Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
¹¹ Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
¹² School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
¹³ Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
¹⁴ Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
¹⁵ Transfusion Medicine, NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Oxford, UK
¹⁶ Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
¹⁷ Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
¹⁸ NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: r.foy@leeds.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is thirty divided by five?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions