Digitally supported CBT to reduce paranoia and improve reasoning for people with schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis: the SlowMo RCT

Garety, Philippa; Ward, Thomas; Emsley, Richard; Greenwood, Kathryn; Freeman, Daniel; Fowler, David; Kuipers, Elizabeth; Bebbington, Paul; Dunn, Graham; Hardy, Amy

doi:10.3310/eme08110

Graphic version of this page | Change how these pages look

Journals Library

NHS NIHR - National Institute for Health and Care Research

Journals

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata .Issue }}
Extended Research Article
i

Toolkit

View Award

This trial showed that the intervention, targeting reasoning, was effective at reducing paranoia in people with schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis.

Philippa Garety
[Image - ORCID logo], Thomas Ward
[Image - ORCID logo], Richard Emsley
[Image - ORCID logo], Kathryn Greenwood
[Image - ORCID logo], Daniel Freeman
[Image - ORCID logo], David Fowler
[Image - ORCID logo], Elizabeth Kuipers
[Image - ORCID logo], Paul Bebbington
[Image - ORCID logo], Graham Dunn
[Image - ORCID logo] & Amy Hardy
[Image - ORCID logo].

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Philippa Garety ^1,^2,^*, Thomas Ward ^1,², Richard Emsley ³, Kathryn Greenwood ^4,⁵, Daniel Freeman ^6,⁷, David Fowler ^4,⁵, Elizabeth Kuipers ^1,², Paul Bebbington ⁸, Graham Dunn ^9,^†, Amy Hardy ^1,²

¹ Department of Psychology, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
² South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
³ Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
⁴ School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
⁵ Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
⁶ Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
⁷ Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
⁸ Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
⁹ Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: Philippa.garety@kcl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

[Image - Crossmark status check]

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*
Name (title, first name, last name)*
Occupation / Job title*
Affiliation / Employer*
Email*
Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas
Statement of competing interestsWe believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.
If yes, please provide details below
Enter response title*
Enter CAPTCHA What is ten minus two?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions