Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The intervention was ineffective in reducing risky drinking in young people aged 14 15 years, although it was well received by the young people and school staff who participated.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Emma L Giles 1, Grant J McGeechan 2, Simon Coulton 3, Paolo Deluca 4, Colin Drummond 4, Denise Howel 5, Eileen Kaner 5, Elaine McColl 5, Ruth McGovern 5, Stephanie Scott 2, Elaine Stamp 5, Harry Sumnall 6, Liz Todd 7, Luke Vale 8, Viviana Albani 8, Sadie Boniface 4, Jennifer Ferguson 1, Eilish Gilvarry 9, Nadine Hendrie 3, Nicola Howe 10, Helen Mossop 5, Amy Ramsay 4, Grant Stanley 6, Dorothy Newbury-Birch 2,*

1 School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
2 School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
3 Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
4 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
5 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
6 Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
7 School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
8 Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
9 Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
10 Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
* Corresponding author Email: d.newbury-birch@tees.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions