Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study effectively developed an acceptable psychoeducational parenting intervention and broadly supported the feasibility of a full trial.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Crispin Day 1,*, Jackie Briskman 2, Mike J Crawford 3, Lisa Foote 4, Lucy Harris 1, Janet Boadu 5, Paul McCrone 6, Mary McMurran 7, Daniel Michelson 8, Paul Moran 9, Liberty Mosse 1, Stephen Scott 10, Daniel Stahl 11, Paul Ramchandani 12, Timothy Weaver 13

1 CAMHS Research Unit, Centre for Parent and Child Support, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Michael Rutter Centre, London, UK
2 Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
3 The Centre for Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
4 The McPin Foundation, London, UK
5 King’s Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
6 Institute of Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK
7 Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
8 School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
9 Centre for Academic Mental Health, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
10 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
11 Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
12 PEDAL Research Centre, The Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
13 Department of Mental Health, Social Work and Integrative Medicine, School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: crispin.1.day@kcl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document