Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Trial found no evidence to support the use of silver alloy catheters for short-term catheterisation. The nitrofurazone catheter was not clinically effective and this trial provides no evidence to justify its use. Some evidence for its microbiological effectiveness was found and economic analysis suggested that it might possibly be cost-effective for use in the UK NHS, although there was a high degree of uncertainty

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

R Pickard, T Lam, G MacLennan, K Starr, M Kilonzo, G McPherson, K Gillies, A McDonald, K Walton, B Buckley, C Glazener, C Boachie, J Burr, J Norrie, L Vale, A Grant & J N’Dow.

R Pickard 1, T Lam 2, G MacLennan 3, K Starr 2,3, M Kilonzo 4, G McPherson 3, K Gillies 3, A McDonald 3, K Walton 5, B Buckley 6, C Glazener 3, C Boachie 3, J Burr 3, J Norrie 3, L Vale 3,7, A Grant 8, J N’Dow 2,*

1 Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
3 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
4 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
5 Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
6 Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
7 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
8 Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
* Corresponding author Email: j.ndow@abdn.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document