Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial found that immediate short-term integrated palliative care did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in patient-reported physical symptoms compared to standard care after 12 weeks.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Nilay Hepgul 1, Rebecca Wilson 1, Deokhee Yi 1, Catherine Evans 1,2, Sabrina Bajwah 1, Vincent Crosby 3, Andrew Wilcock 4, Fiona Lindsay 5, Anthony Byrne 6, Carolyn Young 7, Karen Groves 8, Clare Smith 9, Rachel Burman 10, K Ray Chaudhuri 11, Eli Silber 12, Irene J Higginson 1,*, Wei Gao 1,*

1 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
2 Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
3 Department of Palliative Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
4 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
5 Martlets Hospice, Hove, UK
6 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
7 Department of Neurology, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
8 Queenscourt Hospice, Southport, UK
9 Department of Palliative Care, Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
10 Department of Palliative Care, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
11 National Parkinson Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, UK
12 Department of Neurology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
* Corresponding author Emails: wei.gao@kcl.ac.uk and irene.higginson@kcl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions