Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Treatment with spironolactone, compared with placebo, did not improve exercise tolerance at 2 years for people experiencing atrial fibrillation and preserved ejection fraction.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Eduard Shantsila 1,2,3,4,*, Farhan Shahid 1,2, Yongzhong Sun 5, Jonathan J Deeks 5,6, Ronnie Haynes 2,7, Melanie Calvert 5,8, James P Fisher 9, Paulus Kirchhof 1,2,10, Paramjit S Gill 11, Gregory YH Lip 4

1 Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2 Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
3 North Worcestershire VTS, Health Education England (West Midlands), St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Whiston, Merseyside, UK
4 Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
5 NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
6 Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
7 The Surgery, Birmingham, UK
8 Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
9 Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Department of Physiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
10 University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
11 Academic Unit of Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Eduard.Shantsila@liverpool.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions