Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial showed that the intervention may be acceptable with modifications, but a full trial is unlikely to be feasible due to low recruitment, although other feasibility outcomes were met.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Afia Ali 1,*, Emma Mckenzie 2, Zara Rasoul 1, Angela Hassiotis 1, Stefan Priebe 3, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans 1, Rebecca Jones 1,4, Monica Panca 4, Rumana Omar 5, Sally Finning 6, Shirley Moore 7, Christine Roe 7, Michael King 1,4

1 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
2 Research and Development Office, Goodmayes Hospital, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
3 Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry (World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
4 Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
5 UK Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
6 Outward, London, UK
7 The Befriending Scheme, Sudbury, UK
* Corresponding author Email: afia.ali@ucl.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Several of the authors have held membership positions on National Institute for Health Research funding committee groups: Michael King was a member of the Rapid Trials and Add-on Studies Board (2012–12); Stefan Priebe was a member of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Mental, Psychological and Occupational Health (MPOH) Panel (2014–18); Rumana Omar was a member of the HTA General Committee (2016–20); and Angela Hassiotis is currently a member of the HTA Commissioning Committee (2018–present).

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document