Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

In this study, the mean steps/day were lower for the intervention group than the control group at 6 months and this was sustained at 12 months.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Ruth F Hunter, Aisling Gough, Jennifer M Murray, Jianjun Tang, Sarah F Brennan, Oliver J Chrzanowski-Smith, Angela Carlin, Chris Patterson, Alberto Longo, George Hutchinson, Lindsay Prior, Mark A Tully, David P French, Jean Adams, Emma McIntosh, Yiqiao Xin & Frank Kee.

Ruth F Hunter 1,2,*, Aisling Gough 1,2, Jennifer M Murray 1,2, Jianjun Tang 1,2,3, Sarah F Brennan 1,2, Oliver J Chrzanowski-Smith 4, Angela Carlin 5, Chris Patterson 1,2, Alberto Longo 2,6, George Hutchinson 2,6, Lindsay Prior 2, Mark A Tully 7, David P French 8, Jean Adams 9, Emma McIntosh 10, Yiqiao Xin 10, Frank Kee 1,2

1 Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2 UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
3 School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
4 Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
5 School of Sport, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK
6 School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
7 Institute of Mental Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK
8 School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
9 Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
10 Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
* Corresponding author Email: ruth.hunter@qub.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions