Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

This research programme revealed several potential approaches to dementia home support and found that memory aids in early-stage dementia were not effective.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Paul Clarkson 1,*, David Challis 2, Jane Hughes 2, Brenda Roe 3, Linda Davies 4, Ian Russell 5, Martin Orrell 2, Fiona Poland 6, David Jolley 1, Narinder Kapur 7, Catherine Robinson 1, Helen Chester 2, Sue Davies 1, Caroline Sutcliffe 1, Julie Peconi 5, Rosa Pitts 8, Greg Fegan 5, Saiful Islam 5, Vincent Gillan 1, Charlotte Entwistle 1, Rebecca Beresford 1, Michele Abendstern 1, Clarissa Giebel 9, Saima Ahmed 1, Rowan Jasper 10, Adeela Usman 11, Baber Malik 1, Karen Hayhurst 8

1 Social Care and Society, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2 Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
3 Evidence-based Practice Research Centre, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
4 Health Economics Research Team, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
5 Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
6 School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
7 Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
8 Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
9 Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
10 Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK
11 School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Paul.Clarkson@manchester.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions