Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This research programme showed it is possible to obtain high-quality extracts from electronic patient records to use as a research resource, depending on quality and completeness of patient records.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Neena Modi 1,*, Deborah Ashby 2, Cheryl Battersby 1, Peter Brocklehurst 3, Zoe Chivers 4, Kate Costeloe 5, Elizabeth S Draper 6, Victoria Foster 7, Jacquie Kemp 8, Azeem Majeed 9, Joanna Murray 10, Stavros Petrou 11, Katherine Rogers 12, Shalini Santhakumaran 2, Sonia Saxena 9, Yevgeniy Statnikov 13, Hilary Wong 14, Alys Young 12

1 Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
2 Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
3 Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
4 Bliss, London, UK
5 Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
6 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
7 Department of Social Sciences, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
8 National Programme of Care, NHS England, London, UK
9 School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
10 Development Media International, London, UK
11 Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
12 School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
13 Society and College of Radiographers, London, UK
14 Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions