Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Tools were developed, using large datasets, to predict the outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty, but it would not currently be cost-effective to implement them in the NHS.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Nigel Arden, Doug Altman, David Beard, Andrew Carr, Nicholas Clarke, Gary Collins, Cyrus Cooper, David Culliford, Antonella Delmestri, Stefanie Garden, Tinatin Griffin, Kassim Javaid, Andrew Judge, Jeremy Latham, Mark Mullee, David Murray, Emmanuel Ogundimu, Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva, Andrew Price, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra & James Raftery.

Nigel Arden 1,*, Doug Altman 1, David Beard 1, Andrew Carr 1, Nicholas Clarke 2, Gary Collins 1, Cyrus Cooper 3, David Culliford 4, Antonella Delmestri 1, Stefanie Garden 1, Tinatin Griffin 1, Kassim Javaid 1, Andrew Judge 1, Jeremy Latham 5, Mark Mullee 6, David Murray 1, Emmanuel Ogundimu 1, Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva 1, Andrew Price 1, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra 1, James Raftery 7

1 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Developmental Origins of Health & Disease Division, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
3 Medical Research Council, Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
4 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
5 Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
6 Research & Development Support Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
7 Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
* Corresponding author Email: nigel.arden@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions