Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

As part of the SHIELD programme, Maintenance Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for people with dementia was found in an RCT to be effective and probably cost-effective.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Martin Orrell, Juanita Hoe, Georgina Charlesworth, Ian Russell, David Challis, Esme Moniz-Cook, Martin Knapp, Bob Woods, Zoe Hoare, Elisa Aguirre, Sandeep Toot, Amy Streater, Nadia Crellin, Chris Whitaker, Francesco d’Amico & Amritpal Rehill.

Martin Orrell 1,*, Juanita Hoe 1, Georgina Charlesworth 1, Ian Russell 2, David Challis 3, Esme Moniz-Cook 4, Martin Knapp 5, Bob Woods 6, Zoe Hoare 6, Elisa Aguirre 1, Sandeep Toot 7, Amy Streater 7, Nadia Crellin 7, Chris Whitaker 6, Francesco d’Amico 5, Amritpal Rehill 5

1 Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
2 Clinical Trials Unit, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
3 Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
4 Centre of Dementia Research and Practice, University of Hull, Hull, UK
5 Health and Social Care Department, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
6 North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health (NWORTH) Clinical Trials Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
7 Research and Development Department, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.


Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions