Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

There was no evidence that the intervention improved quality of life at 8 months and there were challenges with recruitment of an active population and delivery.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Gail Mountain 1, Jessica Wright 2, Cindy L Cooper 2,*, Ellen Lee 2, Kirsty Sprange 3, Jules Beresford-Dent 1, Tracey Young 4, Stephen Walters 4, Katherine Berry 5, Tom Dening 6, Amanda Loban 2, Emily Turton 2, Benjamin D Thomas 2, Emma L Young 2, Benjamin J Thompson 2, Bethany Crawford 6, Claire Craig 7, Peter Bowie 8, Esme Moniz-Cook 9, Alexis Foster 4

1 Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
2 Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
3 Nottingham Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
4 School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
5 Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6 Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
7 Art and Design Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
8 Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
9 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
* Corresponding author Email: c.l.cooper@sheffield.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document