Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study found a lack of good-quality evidence for many of the interventions currently in use and no evidence of experiences of implementing interventions for children with non-spinal cord pathology.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Helen Eke 1,, Harriet Hunt 2,, Susan Ball 3,4, Morwenna Rogers 2,4, Rebecca Whear 2,4, Annette Allinson 1, Julia Melluish 1, Claire Lindsay 5, Davina Richardson 6, June Rogers 6, Eve Hutton 7, Nicholas Madden 8, Anne Wright 9, Rob Anderson 2, Stuart Logan 1,4, Jo Thompson Coon 2,4, Christopher Morris 1,4,*

1 Peninsula Childhood Disability Research Unit (PenCRU), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
2 Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement (ESMI), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
3 Health Statistics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
4 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula (PenARC), Exeter, UK
5 Paediatric Bladder and Bowel Care Team, Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
6 Bladder & Bowel UK, Disabled Living, Manchester, UK
7 School of Allied Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
8 Children's Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
9 Evelina London Children’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: christopher.morris@exeter.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions