Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Evolving IT security and electronic record requirements hampered platform function resulting in poor recruitment and early trial closure, and the authors make recommendations about electronic platforms for primary care research.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Alastair D Hay 1,†,*, Michael V Moore 2,, Jodi Taylor 3, Nicholas Turner 3, Sian Noble 3, Christie Cabral 1, Jeremy Horwood 1, Vibhore Prasad 4, Kathryn Curtis 3, Brendan Delaney 5, Roger Damoiseaux 6, Jesús Domínguez 4, Archana Tapuria 4, Sue Harris 3, Paul Little 2, Andrew Lovering 7, Richard Morris 3, Kate Rowley 3, Annie Sadoo 3, Anne Schilder 8, Roderick Venekamp 6, Scott Wilkes 9, Vasa Curcin 4

1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2 Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
3 Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
4 School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
5 Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
6 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care & Department of Otorhinolaryngology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
7 Department of Medical Microbiology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
8 Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
9 School of Medicine, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
* Corresponding author Email: alastair.hay@bristol.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions