Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study confirmed the results of the TOPKAT study and unicompartmental knee replacement was safer and less expensive than total knee replacement for patients with severe comorbidity.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Albert Prats-Uribe 1, Spyros Kolovos 1, Klara Berencsi 1, Andrew Carr 1, Andrew Judge 1,2, Alan Silman 1, Nigel Arden 1,3,4, Irene Petersen 5, Ian J Douglas 6, J Mark Wilkinson 7,8, David Murray 1, Jose M Valderas 9, David J Beard 1, Sarah E Lamb 1,10, M Sanni Ali 1,6, Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva 1, Victoria Y Strauss 1,*, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra 1

1 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
3 Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
4 Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiological Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
5 Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
6 Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
7 Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
8 Research Committee, National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, Hemel Hempstead, UK
9 College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
10 University of Exeter Medical School, Institute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Victoria.strauss@csm.ox.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document