Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial found no evidence that an occupational therapist-delivered home assessment and modification reduced falls in community-dwelling people aged 65 years and over compared with usual care.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Sarah Cockayne 1,*, Alison Pighills 2,3, Joy Adamson 1, Caroline Fairhurst 1, Shelley Crossland 4, Avril Drummond 5, Catherine E Hewitt 1, Sara Rodgers 1, Sarah J Ronaldson 1, Jennifer McCaffery 1, Katie Whiteside 1, Arabella Scantlebury 1, Lyn Robinson-Smith 1, Ann Cochrane 1, Sarah E Lamb 6, Sophie Boyes 7, Simon Gilbody 1, Clare Relton 8, David J Torgerson 1

1 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
2 Mackay Institute of Research and Innovation, Queensland Health, Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, QLD, Australia
3 Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
4 Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
5 School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
6 Institute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
7 York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
8 Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: sarah.cockayne@york.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document