Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study suggested that the ophthalmic grader pathway is safe and saved resources in the surveillance of people with previously treated and stable diabetic macular oedema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Noemi Lois 1,*, Jonathan Cook 2, Ariel Wang 2, Stephen Aldington 3, Hema Mistry 4, Mandy Maredza 4, Danny McAuley 1,5, Tariq Aslam 6, Clare Bailey 7, Victor Chong 8, Faruque Ghanchi 9, Peter Scanlon 3, Sobha Sivaprasad 10, David Steel 11,12, Caroline Styles 13, Augusto Azuara-Blanco 14, Lindsay Prior 14, Norman Waugh 4

1 The Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2 Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3 Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
4 Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
5 The Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
6 The Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital and Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
7 Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
8 Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
9 Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
10 National Institute for Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
11 Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, UK
12 Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
13 Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, UK
14 Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
* Corresponding author Email: n.lois@qub.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions