Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

This home-based intervention was effective in reducing behaviour problems in young children when delivered by health visiting staff.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Christine O’Farrelly 1,2, Beth Barker 1,2, Hilary Watt 3, Daphne Babalis 4, Marian Bakermans-Kranenburg 5, Sarah Byford 6, Poushali Ganguli 6, Ellen Grimås 1, Jane Iles 1,7, Holly Mattock 1, Julia McGinley 8, Charlotte Phillips 1, Rachael Ryan 1, Stephen Scott 6, Jessica Smith 1,4, Alan Stein 9, Eloise Stevens 1,2, Marinus van IJzendoorn 10, Jane Warwick 11, Paul Ramchandani 1,2,*

1 Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK
2 Centre for Research on Play in Education, Development, and Learning, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
3 School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
4 Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
5 Clinical Child and Family Studies, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
6 Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
7 School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
8 Netmums, London, UK
9 Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
10 Department of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
11 Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
* Corresponding author Email: pr441@cam.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions