Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

There was a substantial increase in self-reported use of effective contraception at 4 months in women provided with bridging contraception and an invitation to a sexual and reproductive health clinic.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Sharon T Cameron 1,2,*, Anna Glasier 1, Lisa McDaid 3,4, Andrew Radley 5,6, Susan Patterson 4, Paula Baraitser 7, Judith Stephenson 8, Richard Gilson 9, Claire Battison 10, Kathleen Cowle 11, Thenmalar Vadiveloo 12, Anne Johnstone 1, Alessandra Morelli 7, Beatriz Goulao 12, Mark Forrest 12, Alison McDonald 12, John Norrie 10

1 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2 Sexual and Reproductive Health, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
3 Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD,
4 Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
5 Directorate of Public Health, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
6 Division of Cardiovascular Medicines and Diabetes, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
7 Department of Sexual Health, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
8 Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
9 Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
10 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
11 Community pharmacy, NHS Forth Valley, , UK
12 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
* Corresponding author Email: sharon.cameron@ed.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions