Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study developed an occupational advice intervention tailored to individual needs and demonstrated encouraging rates of adherence, but a randomised trial would be required to assess its effectiveness.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Paul Baker 1,2,*, Carol Coole 3, Avril Drummond 3, Sayeed Khan 4, Catriona McDaid 2, Catherine Hewitt 2, Lucksy Kottam 1, Sarah Ronaldson 2, Elizabeth Coleman 2, David A McDonald 5,6, Fiona Nouri 3, Melanie Narayanasamy 3, Iain McNamara 7, Judith Fitch 8, Louise Thomson 3, Gerry Richardson 9, Amar Rangan 1,2,10,11

1 South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
2 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
3 School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
4 Make UK, The Manufacturers’ Organisation, London, UK
5 Whole System Patient Flow Programme, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, UK
6 Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
7 Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
8 British Orthopaedic Association Patient Liaison Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
9 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
10 Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
11 Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
* Corresponding author Email:

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.


If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document