Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

{{metadata.Title}}

{{metadata.Headline}}

This study found that, for both cancers, whole-body MRI was as sensitive as standard staging.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Stuart A Taylor 1,*, Susan Mallett 2, Anne Miles 3, Stephen Morris 4, Laura Quinn 2, Caroline S Clarke 5, Sandy Beare 6, John Bridgewater 7, Vicky Goh 8, Sam Janes 9, Dow-Mu Koh 10, Alison Morton 11, Neal Navani 9, Alfred Oliver 11, Anwar Padhani 12, Shonit Punwani 1, Andrea Rockall 13, Steve Halligan 1

1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
2 Institute of Applied Health Research, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
4 Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
5 Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, and Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
6 Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK
7 UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
8 Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
9 Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK
10 Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
11 c/o Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
12 Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
13 Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: stuart.taylor@ucl.ac.uk

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} {{metadata.Title}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 2 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions