Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Hysterectomy was associated with higher patient satisfaction and better quality of life at 15 months than endometrial ablation but it was more costly in the short term.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Kevin Cooper 1,*, Suzanne Breeman 2, Neil W Scott 3, Graham Scotland 2,4, Rodolfo Hernández 4, T Justin Clark 5, Jed Hawe 6, Robert Hawthorn 7, Kevin Phillips 8, Samantha Wileman 2, Kirsty McCormack 2, John Norrie 9, Siladitya Bhattacharya 1,10

1 NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
2 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
3 Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
4 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
5 Birmingham Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
6 Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK
7 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
8 Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
9 Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences & Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
10 Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
* Corresponding author Email: kevincooper@nhs.net

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document